I have had my pistol permit for some time now. On one hand, Judge Richards was too strict on the restrictions; on the other hand, no course was required. Now that he is out of office, his sports …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
I have had my pistol permit for some time now. On one hand, Judge Richards was too strict on the restrictions; on the other hand, no course was required. Now that he is out of office, his sports restriction is destined to be removed but with a new restriction, a pistol safety course.
For new pistol owners, such a course would certainly not hurt. But for experienced pistol owners, I ask, why? In my case, I am a retired military office and federal agent. I carried a pistol for over twenty years for military and law enforcement matters.
My federal credentials state that I was authorized to carry a concealed weapon. I had more training than most every day pistol owners probably will ever have.
I have to take a safety course? How about I bring my retired federal credentials with me to the office? Will that do?
This seems to me to be a case of nerves in allowing pistol permits in general.
Dr. Steven Gilbert
Canton