Over-policing the St. Lawrence River is an excellent way to hinder tourism on what many consider to the area’s greatest attraction. I am sure many people will argue no one should be afraid if they …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Over-policing the St. Lawrence River is an excellent way to hinder tourism on what many consider to the area’s greatest attraction. I am sure many people will argue no one should be afraid if they aren’t breaking the law. However, most people would rather avoid having their vessel boarded for no reason other than a “routine inspection.” Such inspections aren’t legal on land without reasonable suspicion, a standard that is already incredibly easy to meet. For the U.S. Coast Guard, even that very limited protection against privacy invasion is tossed aside in the name of public safety. While law enforcement is necessary and serves an important purpose in responding to threats and emergencies that arise on the water, I personally do not think random boarding, inspection and interrogation will be good for the financial struggling county’s effort to promote river tourism. Nobody wants to be delayed without cause, regardless of the legality of the practice.