X

Following attorney review, Ogdensburg will respond to public records request that was improperly delayed for months

Posted 6/14/17

By JIMMY LAWTON OGDENSBURG -- An Ogdensburg man who filed a $1 million notice of claim against the city has had a request for public records improperly delayed for months, but the city says it will …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in

Following attorney review, Ogdensburg will respond to public records request that was improperly delayed for months

Posted

By JIMMY LAWTON

OGDENSBURG -- An Ogdensburg man who filed a $1 million notice of claim against the city has had a request for public records improperly delayed for months, but the city says it will now respond to the request.

At a Monday meeting, Richard Pratt questioned why a public records request he filed in April had not yet been filled or officially denied by the Ogdensburg, as required by law.

Pratt is the father of Richard Pratt II, who claims he was beaten, shocked with Taser and held at gunpoint by an Ogdensburg police officer in January.

Pratt was requesting information regarding police policies related to drawing weapons and use of Tasers.

Ogdensburg City Manager Sarah Purdy told Pratt Monday at the council meeting that the city was advised not to answer the request by legal counsel, however she now says the city will respond to the request.

“What Mr. Pratt submitted to the city was a Public Records Inquest, which is different than a FOIL request. Perhaps he meant to submit a FOIL request, but that is not what he did. In any event, the City Clerk's Office received the notice of claim about a month before the Inquest was submitted, and the city attorney therefore advised that no answer to the inquest be made until the attorney assigned by our insurance carrier had reviewed all of the documents,” Purdy said in an emailed response. “That has now happened, and in fact we just learned from the attorney that we can respond to the Inquest, so staff is in the process of preparing a response, which will be reviewed before it is released.”

According to Robert Freeman, from the Committee on Open Government, Richard Pratt’s request was in fact covered under the Freedom of Information Request.

He said that if the written request for public records can be understood, it is sufficient under FOIL.

“If it looks like a FOIL request, and smells like a FOIL request it’s a FOIL request, regardless of what the letterhead says,” Freeman said.

When an agency receives a request, Freedom of Information Law states it has five business days to grant or deny access in whole or in part, or if more time is needed, to acknowledge the receipt of the request in writing and indicate an approximate date by which the agency will respond to the request, usually not more than 20 additional business days.

Pratt received no such response.