To the Editor: In response to “Equal Time For Equal Crime” which ran in the May 14-20 edition: While, on basic principal I agree with Nancy Kimble, there are certainly a number of unknown factors …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the Editor:
In response to “Equal Time For Equal Crime” which ran in the May 14-20 edition:
While, on basic principal I agree with Nancy Kimble, there are certainly a number of unknown factors involved in the discrepancy of punishment for Amanda Matott and Pierre Bond.
However, after a few minutes of info-seeking, as informed citizens we should be aware of this: Mrs. Matott was charged with second-degree rape and second-degree sexual assault and pleaded guilty to third-degree rape (not first-degree as Mrs. Kimble state.) Mr. Bond was charged with first-degree rape and pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal sexual act.
Sexual assault statutes are very specific about ages and a first-degree sexual assault act carries a minimum of five-year sentence. There are no minimum sentences for second or third degree assaults from what I have found. Mr. Bond, 55, assaulted a nine year-old girl. Mrs. Matott, 23, assaulted a 13 year-old boy. Assault of any child under the age of 11 receives a much greater sentence.
If you don’t agree with the statutes of the laws speak to your state representative. I would urge anyone looking to make a public issue of something to educate yourself before making your argument.
Jared Carey
Potsdam