To the Editor: School districts are sharing significant amounts of student data with the education technology industry, all as part of the mandated testing of students by the state. Are parents’ …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the Editor:
School districts are sharing significant amounts of student data with the education technology industry, all as part of the mandated testing of students by the state. Are parents’ rights to approve the sharing of information about their children being circumvented by schools?
Senator Markey (D-Mass), a students’ privacy advocate, sent a letter to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and wrote “Such loss of parental control over their child’s educational records and performance information could have longstanding consequences for the future prospects of students.”
When I spoke to Robert Freeman, director of the state Committee on Open Government, he mentioned that the FERPA (student privacy) laws had been weakened in recent years. Sen. Markey refers to this weakening of FERPA in questions to Duncan. He wrote “In 2008 and 2011, the department issued new regulation with respect to FERPA that addressed how schools can outsource core functions such as scheduling or data management and how third parties may access confidential information about students. These changes also permit other government agencies that are not under the direct control of the state educational authorities, such as state health departments, to access student information.”
Are there strict federal guidelines and standards to protect students’ privacy? I doubt it.
Have parents’ rights’ been trod upon? Certainly.
Have the possible consequences of sharing so much confidential student information with private corporations (involved in an estimated $8 billion industry) been fully considered? Not likely.
Students’ privacy should not be sacrificed at the schoolhouse doors.
Ann Martin Carvill
Potsdam