To the Editor: I have been observing the election process here in Hammond for the past several months and was somewhat surprised when Councilmen Pitcher and Langtry garnered as many votes in the …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
To the Editor:
I have been observing the election process here in Hammond for the past several months and was somewhat surprised when Councilmen Pitcher and Langtry garnered as many votes in the Republican primary as they did.
Both Councilmen Pitcher and Langtry have been on the Hammond Town board for decades and are running once again to the tune of “experience”. How so?
After all of these years, taxes have increased under their watch and the town has deteriorated.
What has been their plan for community development? To either sign a secret wind lease with their property or to keep quiet about a relative who has.
This does not seem to me to be keeping the welfare of the entire community in the forefront. The last straw occurred at the town board meeting on October 10, when Supervisor Bertram proposed that the board send a resolution to Albany lawmakers, protesting the passage of Article X last August, which proposes to strip away local home rule for the siting of industrial power facilities, be they solar, wind, nuclear, hydropower or whatever.
Mr. Pitcher and Mr. Langtry both voted “no” to the town board issuing a statement of protest to taking away our home rule rights.
This begs the question, why would they, as Republicans, even hesitate to voice any opposition to a piece of state legislation pushed through by a Democratic governor who wants to erode the right of our town to make its own decisions regarding land use?
The answer seems obvious.
The town of Hammond enacted a wind law that provides for safe setbacks and noise controls.
However, this local law might limit Mr. Pitcher’s ability to erect industrial wind turbines on his leased land, costing him income.
Instead, these two councilmen would prefer Albany to make the decisions for the people of Hammond.
They would prefer Albany to site power facilities where Albany wants them in order to use North Country resources to generate electricity that will be shipped south.
Voters, please, it’s time to wake up.
We need new people on the town council who have a far reaching vision of what can be possible to re-vitalize the entire town of Hammond.
Good Government candidates Young and Demick have shown that they have vision, that they are engaged in discussion about alternatives to bringing prosperity to the town and that they are clearly the best choice for the town board.
Valerie Johnson
Chippewa Bay